Home
Below are 3 letters concerning Cassino v. Chase as follows:
Tuesday, May 3rd 2016 to Mr. Jamie Dimon, Chairman & CEO, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Friday, May 13th, 2016 to Ms. Cynthia Coffman, Colorado Attorney General
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 to Richard Cordray, Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Tuesday, May 3rd 2016 to Mr. Jamie Dimon, Chairman & CEO, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Friday, May 13th, 2016 to Ms. Cynthia Coffman, Colorado Attorney General
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 to Richard Cordray, Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016
Mr. Jamie Dimon
Chairman & CEO
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
212-270-1111
[email protected]
RE: Lance Cassino "Cassino" and JPMorgan Chase "Chase" > Is it time to finally settle Chase v. Cassino and Cassino v. Chase?
Dear Mr. Dimon,
Sometimes favorable "win win settlement offers" need to be made to the top decision maker - this is one - so that you at least had the opportunity to decide who to delegate it to for accepting or rejecting our offer.
This settlement offer simply boils down to Chase paying it's own attorney fees and the same for Cassino after more than 5 years of legal action in both State and Federal courts.
This foreclosure case started when Chase wrongfully refused accepting my regular monthly payment on 1/15/2011 - after I retained Mitchell J. Stein & Associates 12/20/2010 to negotiate a loan mod if Chase was holder in due course of my deed and note and if not quiet title. I retained Mr. Stein after 3 HAMP/HARP loan modification turn downs in 2009-2010 - even though I was qualified - Chase was not. At the time of Chase refusing payment 1/15/2011, I was following the local Colorado Chase representative's advice the previous month to request a 4th loan modification request.
I am offering Chase a $10,000 settlement of Chase's 5 year wrongful foreclosure attempt litigated in both Jefferson County District Court and Federal Court 2011-2013 which has been in a stalemate since Chase withdrew their foreclosure case and agreed to a "partial settlement" in March 2013 paying me $10,000 for my 3 attorneys fees and to withdraw my counter claim for quiet title.
For the $10,000 Chase records both a satisfaction of deed and an instrument to nullify the false and fraudulent corporate assignment of deed of trust recorded by Chase/MERS on 9/28/2011, plus agreeing to not issuing any 1099 for deficiency as there is none with Chase.
By paying Chase $10,000 to settle this, Cassino is in effect paying his own attorneys fees (now totaling over $20,000) and Chase is paying for their own attorney fees.
Chase wrongfully entered into that "partial settlement" with no capacity, no standing and no jurisdiction. The two law firms representing Chase www.KutakRock.com (lead attorney Jeremy Peck) and www.KarshFulton.com (lead attorney Fred Gabler) withdrew from representing Chase and the law firm involved in filing the false Notice of Election and Demand 3/17/2011 and the false Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust - Aronowitz & Mecklenberg - was shut down by the Colorado Attorney General 2013?. Chase v Cassino and Cassino v Chase has been in a stalemate since.
Regarding Aronowitz & Mecklenberg attorney Lisa Cancanon: It is Cassino's understanding and belief that she filed a false instrument - the Notice of Election and Demand for Sale violating Colorado Statute 18-5-114 Offering a false instrument for recording is a felony. And it is also Cassino's understanding and belief that Kutak Rock LLC attorney Jeremy Peck may have been involved in filed false instruments, the Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust and 2 different Affidavits of Lost Note/Instrument upon the court and the trustee.
Mr. Dimon the following are Chase's key problems - as we see it - in not settling this matter very soon:
1 - Chase in general has no capacity, jurisdiction and standing as note holder in due course - person entitled to enforce "PETE".
2 - Fraud at loan closing sometime in 2005 - with "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." which was not the actual lender, M.E.R.S. not being fully disclosed, securitization not being fully disclosed, the deed and note did not make it to trust, and more.
3 - Fraud by Chase attorney for recording a false instrument in the land records - the Notice of Election and Demand for Sale to foreclose filed on or about 3/17/2011 by law firm Aronowitz and Mecklenburg (which was forced to sell or shut down by the Colorado Attorney General in 2014).
4 - Fraud by Chase attorney/s for recording a false instrument in the land records - 6 months after claiming "PETE" - on 9/28/2011 by filing the Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust by robo-signing and robo-notarizing.
5 - In 2011-12 Chase states to court and trustee that Chase lost the "note or instrument" per 2 different V.P. affidavits by robo-signing and robo-notarizing.
6 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed and note are null and void by operation of law effective 1/30/2015 or 2/5/2015 by TILA rescission.
7 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed has only a vacant 5 acre parcel on it - not the adjoining 5 acres with home and improvements on it. Oddly, Community Mortgage Group, Inc. went out of business 2 months after closing in 2005.
8 - Chase had no capacity, jurisdiction and standing to enter into "partial settlement" made in March 2013 when Chase paid $10,000 of Cassino attorney fees trying to con Cassino into reforming Community Mortgage Group, Inc. deed of trust to add 5 acres with home and improvements.
9 - In future discovery from Cassino securitization analysis report/s regarding account transactions it is likely that insurance payments and other financial transactions will show Chase guilty of unjust enrichment and unclean hands.
10 - Chase - because of the above and even more - is guilty of false and fraudulent foreclosure for maximum damages allowed.
The cases involved are documented for you and your decision makers in a nutshell at:
www.CassinovChase.weebly.com < this settlement offer letter to Mr. Jamie Dimon and more.
www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com < the previous legal actions the last 5 plus years.
The settlement offer is for Chase to use some of the $4 billion allocated to homeowners in the $13 Billion Justice Department settlement with Chase in November 2013 plus $10,000 from Cassino for Chase to complete a quiet title on my vacant 5.1 acre parcel, which again, is all that is on the deed of trust.
If this settlement offer is not acceptable, we will then both take further legal action in the court of law as documented at the above Cassino v. Chase case sites and now in the court of public opinion.
If this settlement is acceptable, please have your people contact my attorney of record on this matter - updated 7/11/2017 Tim Bullock, 888-682-3788, fax 303-495-2198, [email protected] - to reduce to a final settlement agreement for execution and signing.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
c.c.
Mr. Jamie Dimon c/o The Corporation Company, 1675 Broadway, #1200, Denver, CO 80202
Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman, 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, CO 80203
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, P.O. Box 4503, Iowa City, Iowa 52244
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chase settles with U.S. for $13 Billion
$4 billion goes to homeowners
Los Angeles Times - Nov. 20, 2013
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-jpmorgan-doj-deal-20131120,0,1814328.story#axzz2lEDP1hy3
JPMorgan Chase agreed to a $13-billion settlement with the government over selling shoddy mortgage investments, ending a legal battle that signals a tougher stance against Wall Street wrongdoing. The nation's largest bank admitted to knowingly peddling the toxic securities that helped lead to the housing bubble and the worst financial meltdown since the Great Depression.
California, slammed by 1 million foreclosures during the mortgage meltdown, will be a major beneficiary of the deal. The agreement includes $4 billion to help homeowners across the nation who were foreclosed on or who are struggling with their loans.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was pleased officials were taking action. "What the American people understand is that we continue to be in the midst of a terrible, terrible economic downturn because of the greed and recklessness and illegal behavior of Wall Street,” Sanders said. “And I think people want justice to be done."
It was unclear Tuesday how the $4-billion relief program would be apportioned to struggling homeowners. Chase said it would distribute the assistance over the next four years. Half of the program will go toward writing down the balance of mortgages and waiving certain payments on home loans. Most of that would be achieved through outright forgiveness of first-mortgage debt.
Investors in Chase appeared to be relieved the bank was able to arrive at the the largest settlement made by any single American company in history. The bank's shares rose 41 cents, or 0.7%, to $56.15 on Tuesday, while major U.S. stock indexes edged lower. So apparently Wall St. thinks the Biggest Bank got off light.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/11/20/where-does-jpmorgans-13-billion-go/?_r=0
Mr. Jamie Dimon
Chairman & CEO
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
212-270-1111
[email protected]
RE: Lance Cassino "Cassino" and JPMorgan Chase "Chase" > Is it time to finally settle Chase v. Cassino and Cassino v. Chase?
Dear Mr. Dimon,
Sometimes favorable "win win settlement offers" need to be made to the top decision maker - this is one - so that you at least had the opportunity to decide who to delegate it to for accepting or rejecting our offer.
This settlement offer simply boils down to Chase paying it's own attorney fees and the same for Cassino after more than 5 years of legal action in both State and Federal courts.
This foreclosure case started when Chase wrongfully refused accepting my regular monthly payment on 1/15/2011 - after I retained Mitchell J. Stein & Associates 12/20/2010 to negotiate a loan mod if Chase was holder in due course of my deed and note and if not quiet title. I retained Mr. Stein after 3 HAMP/HARP loan modification turn downs in 2009-2010 - even though I was qualified - Chase was not. At the time of Chase refusing payment 1/15/2011, I was following the local Colorado Chase representative's advice the previous month to request a 4th loan modification request.
I am offering Chase a $10,000 settlement of Chase's 5 year wrongful foreclosure attempt litigated in both Jefferson County District Court and Federal Court 2011-2013 which has been in a stalemate since Chase withdrew their foreclosure case and agreed to a "partial settlement" in March 2013 paying me $10,000 for my 3 attorneys fees and to withdraw my counter claim for quiet title.
For the $10,000 Chase records both a satisfaction of deed and an instrument to nullify the false and fraudulent corporate assignment of deed of trust recorded by Chase/MERS on 9/28/2011, plus agreeing to not issuing any 1099 for deficiency as there is none with Chase.
By paying Chase $10,000 to settle this, Cassino is in effect paying his own attorneys fees (now totaling over $20,000) and Chase is paying for their own attorney fees.
Chase wrongfully entered into that "partial settlement" with no capacity, no standing and no jurisdiction. The two law firms representing Chase www.KutakRock.com (lead attorney Jeremy Peck) and www.KarshFulton.com (lead attorney Fred Gabler) withdrew from representing Chase and the law firm involved in filing the false Notice of Election and Demand 3/17/2011 and the false Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust - Aronowitz & Mecklenberg - was shut down by the Colorado Attorney General 2013?. Chase v Cassino and Cassino v Chase has been in a stalemate since.
Regarding Aronowitz & Mecklenberg attorney Lisa Cancanon: It is Cassino's understanding and belief that she filed a false instrument - the Notice of Election and Demand for Sale violating Colorado Statute 18-5-114 Offering a false instrument for recording is a felony. And it is also Cassino's understanding and belief that Kutak Rock LLC attorney Jeremy Peck may have been involved in filed false instruments, the Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust and 2 different Affidavits of Lost Note/Instrument upon the court and the trustee.
Mr. Dimon the following are Chase's key problems - as we see it - in not settling this matter very soon:
1 - Chase in general has no capacity, jurisdiction and standing as note holder in due course - person entitled to enforce "PETE".
2 - Fraud at loan closing sometime in 2005 - with "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." which was not the actual lender, M.E.R.S. not being fully disclosed, securitization not being fully disclosed, the deed and note did not make it to trust, and more.
3 - Fraud by Chase attorney for recording a false instrument in the land records - the Notice of Election and Demand for Sale to foreclose filed on or about 3/17/2011 by law firm Aronowitz and Mecklenburg (which was forced to sell or shut down by the Colorado Attorney General in 2014).
4 - Fraud by Chase attorney/s for recording a false instrument in the land records - 6 months after claiming "PETE" - on 9/28/2011 by filing the Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust by robo-signing and robo-notarizing.
5 - In 2011-12 Chase states to court and trustee that Chase lost the "note or instrument" per 2 different V.P. affidavits by robo-signing and robo-notarizing.
6 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed and note are null and void by operation of law effective 1/30/2015 or 2/5/2015 by TILA rescission.
7 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed has only a vacant 5 acre parcel on it - not the adjoining 5 acres with home and improvements on it. Oddly, Community Mortgage Group, Inc. went out of business 2 months after closing in 2005.
8 - Chase had no capacity, jurisdiction and standing to enter into "partial settlement" made in March 2013 when Chase paid $10,000 of Cassino attorney fees trying to con Cassino into reforming Community Mortgage Group, Inc. deed of trust to add 5 acres with home and improvements.
9 - In future discovery from Cassino securitization analysis report/s regarding account transactions it is likely that insurance payments and other financial transactions will show Chase guilty of unjust enrichment and unclean hands.
10 - Chase - because of the above and even more - is guilty of false and fraudulent foreclosure for maximum damages allowed.
The cases involved are documented for you and your decision makers in a nutshell at:
www.CassinovChase.weebly.com < this settlement offer letter to Mr. Jamie Dimon and more.
www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com < the previous legal actions the last 5 plus years.
The settlement offer is for Chase to use some of the $4 billion allocated to homeowners in the $13 Billion Justice Department settlement with Chase in November 2013 plus $10,000 from Cassino for Chase to complete a quiet title on my vacant 5.1 acre parcel, which again, is all that is on the deed of trust.
If this settlement offer is not acceptable, we will then both take further legal action in the court of law as documented at the above Cassino v. Chase case sites and now in the court of public opinion.
If this settlement is acceptable, please have your people contact my attorney of record on this matter - updated 7/11/2017 Tim Bullock, 888-682-3788, fax 303-495-2198, [email protected] - to reduce to a final settlement agreement for execution and signing.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
c.c.
Mr. Jamie Dimon c/o The Corporation Company, 1675 Broadway, #1200, Denver, CO 80202
Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman, 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, CO 80203
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, P.O. Box 4503, Iowa City, Iowa 52244
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chase settles with U.S. for $13 Billion
$4 billion goes to homeowners
Los Angeles Times - Nov. 20, 2013
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-jpmorgan-doj-deal-20131120,0,1814328.story#axzz2lEDP1hy3
JPMorgan Chase agreed to a $13-billion settlement with the government over selling shoddy mortgage investments, ending a legal battle that signals a tougher stance against Wall Street wrongdoing. The nation's largest bank admitted to knowingly peddling the toxic securities that helped lead to the housing bubble and the worst financial meltdown since the Great Depression.
California, slammed by 1 million foreclosures during the mortgage meltdown, will be a major beneficiary of the deal. The agreement includes $4 billion to help homeowners across the nation who were foreclosed on or who are struggling with their loans.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was pleased officials were taking action. "What the American people understand is that we continue to be in the midst of a terrible, terrible economic downturn because of the greed and recklessness and illegal behavior of Wall Street,” Sanders said. “And I think people want justice to be done."
It was unclear Tuesday how the $4-billion relief program would be apportioned to struggling homeowners. Chase said it would distribute the assistance over the next four years. Half of the program will go toward writing down the balance of mortgages and waiving certain payments on home loans. Most of that would be achieved through outright forgiveness of first-mortgage debt.
Investors in Chase appeared to be relieved the bank was able to arrive at the the largest settlement made by any single American company in history. The bank's shares rose 41 cents, or 0.7%, to $56.15 on Tuesday, while major U.S. stock indexes edged lower. So apparently Wall St. thinks the Biggest Bank got off light.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/11/20/where-does-jpmorgans-13-billion-go/?_r=0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 13th, 2016
Cynthia Coffman
Colorado Attorney General
1300 Broadway, 10th Floor,
Denver, CO 80203
Dear Ms. Coffman,
My name is Lance Cassino. I am a certified paralegal and work for attorneys and homeowners dealing with foreclosure by doing case intakes and chain of title assessments. I need your help.
Enclosed is a letter sent to Jamie Dimon May 3rd, 2016 offering Chase $10,000 to settle an unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure case they started March 17, 2011. The letter explains in a nutshell my case with all details at www.CassinovChase.weebly.com and www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com.
This is a case of white collar crime with a false and fraudulent Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust (including robo-signing and robo-notarizing) by Chase and related Notice of Election and Demand For Sale (NED) by Aronowitz & Mecklengberg attorneys was fraud upon the land records, fraud upon the court and fraud upon the trustee. I filed a complaint 10/19/2015 with the Jefferson County Sheriff, complaint Case number 15-22789. (CO Statute 18-5-114. Offering a false instrument by recording fraudulent assignment on the Jefferson County land records a class 5 felony. Attached to the complaint was a cover letter to Sheriff Jeff Schrader, a copy of the assignment and a copy of the statute). See www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com/supporting-documents.html
Aronowitz & Mecklenburg had a lawsuit brought against them by your predecessor, John Suthers, alleging violations of Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act, Anti-trust Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. That was just the tip of the iceberg as thousands of photoshopped assignments, notes and other documents were used to foreclose on those who could not afford a good attorney.
Chase and I signed a “partial settlement” agreement in March, 2013 where Chase paid $10,000 of my attorney fees to avoid trial on their self-generated assignment using MERS and falsified NED by Aronowitz & Mecklenburg attorney Lisa Cancanon. My attorney Steve Navarro explained that the agreement was null and void because Chase had no standing, capacity or jurisdiction to make it. So, Chase and I have been in a stalemate since and now it is time to quiet title and move on with our financial life that has been on hold going on 6 years now.
I’m simply asking you to write a letter to Jamie Dimon suggesting that for the good of all involved in this case to accept our offer and terms to settle this matter to avoid both another court of law and the court of public opinion this time.
Otherwise, if this is not settled in the next month or so, my attorneys are ready to begin a series of targeted lawsuits some including a law firm and an attorney as defendants to prevent Chase from stealing another home. Chase is trying to get a free home not me. Because, if Chase can show my attorneys and document examiner a check or wire transfer showing they bought my loan, note and deed, I will payoff Chase once a true balance is determined. Otherwise, I do not know who to pay other than the many investors that may have a certificate for a piece of my loan, note and deed in mortgage backed securities per my planned expert witness on securitization Marie McDonnell.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
www.YourCaseSite.com
Friday, May 13th, 2016
Cynthia Coffman
Colorado Attorney General
1300 Broadway, 10th Floor,
Denver, CO 80203
Dear Ms. Coffman,
My name is Lance Cassino. I am a certified paralegal and work for attorneys and homeowners dealing with foreclosure by doing case intakes and chain of title assessments. I need your help.
Enclosed is a letter sent to Jamie Dimon May 3rd, 2016 offering Chase $10,000 to settle an unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure case they started March 17, 2011. The letter explains in a nutshell my case with all details at www.CassinovChase.weebly.com and www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com.
This is a case of white collar crime with a false and fraudulent Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust (including robo-signing and robo-notarizing) by Chase and related Notice of Election and Demand For Sale (NED) by Aronowitz & Mecklengberg attorneys was fraud upon the land records, fraud upon the court and fraud upon the trustee. I filed a complaint 10/19/2015 with the Jefferson County Sheriff, complaint Case number 15-22789. (CO Statute 18-5-114. Offering a false instrument by recording fraudulent assignment on the Jefferson County land records a class 5 felony. Attached to the complaint was a cover letter to Sheriff Jeff Schrader, a copy of the assignment and a copy of the statute). See www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com/supporting-documents.html
Aronowitz & Mecklenburg had a lawsuit brought against them by your predecessor, John Suthers, alleging violations of Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act, Anti-trust Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. That was just the tip of the iceberg as thousands of photoshopped assignments, notes and other documents were used to foreclose on those who could not afford a good attorney.
Chase and I signed a “partial settlement” agreement in March, 2013 where Chase paid $10,000 of my attorney fees to avoid trial on their self-generated assignment using MERS and falsified NED by Aronowitz & Mecklenburg attorney Lisa Cancanon. My attorney Steve Navarro explained that the agreement was null and void because Chase had no standing, capacity or jurisdiction to make it. So, Chase and I have been in a stalemate since and now it is time to quiet title and move on with our financial life that has been on hold going on 6 years now.
I’m simply asking you to write a letter to Jamie Dimon suggesting that for the good of all involved in this case to accept our offer and terms to settle this matter to avoid both another court of law and the court of public opinion this time.
Otherwise, if this is not settled in the next month or so, my attorneys are ready to begin a series of targeted lawsuits some including a law firm and an attorney as defendants to prevent Chase from stealing another home. Chase is trying to get a free home not me. Because, if Chase can show my attorneys and document examiner a check or wire transfer showing they bought my loan, note and deed, I will payoff Chase once a true balance is determined. Otherwise, I do not know who to pay other than the many investors that may have a certificate for a piece of my loan, note and deed in mortgage backed securities per my planned expert witness on securitization Marie McDonnell.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
www.YourCaseSite.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016
Richard Cordray
Director
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
1700 G Street
Washington, DC 20552
(855) 411-2372
Dear Mr. Cordray,
My name is Lance Cassino. I am a certified paralegal and work for attorneys and homeowners dealing with foreclosure by doing case intakes and chain of title assessments. I need your help.
Enclosed is a letter sent to Jamie Dimon May 3rd, 2016 offering Chase $10,000 to settle an unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure case they started March 17, 2011. The letter explains in a nutshell my case with all details at www.CassinovChase.weebly.com and www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com.
This is a case of white collar crime with a false and fraudulent Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust (including robo-signing and robo-notarizing) by Chase and related Notice of Election and Demand For Sale (NED) by Aronowitz & Mecklengberg attorneys was fraud upon the land records, fraud upon the court and fraud upon the trustee. I filed a complaint 10/19/2015 with the Jefferson County Sheriff, complaint Case number 15-22789. (CO Statute 18-5-114. Offering a false instrument by recording fraudulent assignment on the Jefferson County land records a class 5 felony. Attached to the complaint was a cover letter to Sheriff Jeff Schrader, a copy of the assignment and a copy of the statute). See www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com/supporting-documents.html
Aronowitz & Mecklenburg had a lawsuit brought against them by Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, alleging violations of Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act, Anti-trust Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. That was just the tip of the iceberg as thousands of photoshopped assignments, notes and other documents were used to foreclose on those who could not afford a good attorney.
Chase and I signed a “partial settlement” agreement in March, 2013 where Chase paid $10,000 of my attorney fees to avoid trial on their self-generated assignment using MERS and falsified NED by Aronowitz & Mecklenburg attorney Lisa Cancanon. My attorney Steve Navarro explained that the agreement was null and void because Chase had no standing, capacity or jurisdiction to make it. So, Chase and I have been in a stalemate since and now it is time to quiet title and move on with our financial life that has been on hold going on 6 years now.
I’m simply asking you to write a letter to Jamie Dimon suggesting that for the good of all involved in this case to accept our offer and terms to settle this matter to avoid both another court of law and the court of public opinion this time.
Otherwise, if this is not settled in the next month or so, my attorneys are ready to begin a series of targeted lawsuits some including a law firm and an attorney as defendants to prevent Chase from stealing another home. Chase is trying to get a free home not me. Because, if Chase can show my attorneys and document examiner a check or wire transfer showing they bought my loan, note and deed, I will payoff Chase once a true balance is determined. Otherwise, I do not know who to pay other than the many investors that may have a certificate for a piece of my loan, note and deed in mortgage backed securities per my planned expert witness on securitization Marie McDonnell.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The borrower owes money not to the world at large but to a particular person or institution, and only the person or institution entitled to payment may enforce the debt by foreclosing on the security.”
“[O]nly the entity currently entitled to enforce a debt may foreclose on the mortgage or deed of trust securing that debt . . . .” (Yvanova, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 928.). The court was not influenced by the creation of a false assignment post-foreclosure sale, and ruled according to the recorded documents.” http://cassinovchase.weebly.com/sciarratta-v-us-bank.html
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016
Richard Cordray
Director
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
1700 G Street
Washington, DC 20552
(855) 411-2372
Dear Mr. Cordray,
My name is Lance Cassino. I am a certified paralegal and work for attorneys and homeowners dealing with foreclosure by doing case intakes and chain of title assessments. I need your help.
Enclosed is a letter sent to Jamie Dimon May 3rd, 2016 offering Chase $10,000 to settle an unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure case they started March 17, 2011. The letter explains in a nutshell my case with all details at www.CassinovChase.weebly.com and www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com.
This is a case of white collar crime with a false and fraudulent Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust (including robo-signing and robo-notarizing) by Chase and related Notice of Election and Demand For Sale (NED) by Aronowitz & Mecklengberg attorneys was fraud upon the land records, fraud upon the court and fraud upon the trustee. I filed a complaint 10/19/2015 with the Jefferson County Sheriff, complaint Case number 15-22789. (CO Statute 18-5-114. Offering a false instrument by recording fraudulent assignment on the Jefferson County land records a class 5 felony. Attached to the complaint was a cover letter to Sheriff Jeff Schrader, a copy of the assignment and a copy of the statute). See www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com/supporting-documents.html
Aronowitz & Mecklenburg had a lawsuit brought against them by Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, alleging violations of Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act, Anti-trust Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. That was just the tip of the iceberg as thousands of photoshopped assignments, notes and other documents were used to foreclose on those who could not afford a good attorney.
Chase and I signed a “partial settlement” agreement in March, 2013 where Chase paid $10,000 of my attorney fees to avoid trial on their self-generated assignment using MERS and falsified NED by Aronowitz & Mecklenburg attorney Lisa Cancanon. My attorney Steve Navarro explained that the agreement was null and void because Chase had no standing, capacity or jurisdiction to make it. So, Chase and I have been in a stalemate since and now it is time to quiet title and move on with our financial life that has been on hold going on 6 years now.
I’m simply asking you to write a letter to Jamie Dimon suggesting that for the good of all involved in this case to accept our offer and terms to settle this matter to avoid both another court of law and the court of public opinion this time.
Otherwise, if this is not settled in the next month or so, my attorneys are ready to begin a series of targeted lawsuits some including a law firm and an attorney as defendants to prevent Chase from stealing another home. Chase is trying to get a free home not me. Because, if Chase can show my attorneys and document examiner a check or wire transfer showing they bought my loan, note and deed, I will payoff Chase once a true balance is determined. Otherwise, I do not know who to pay other than the many investors that may have a certificate for a piece of my loan, note and deed in mortgage backed securities per my planned expert witness on securitization Marie McDonnell.
Thank you,
Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
[email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The borrower owes money not to the world at large but to a particular person or institution, and only the person or institution entitled to payment may enforce the debt by foreclosing on the security.”
“[O]nly the entity currently entitled to enforce a debt may foreclose on the mortgage or deed of trust securing that debt . . . .” (Yvanova, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 928.). The court was not influenced by the creation of a false assignment post-foreclosure sale, and ruled according to the recorded documents.” http://cassinovchase.weebly.com/sciarratta-v-us-bank.html