Unclean Hands Decision
From: nancy duffy <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:58 PM
To: Lance Cassino
Subject: VERY IMPORTANT! The Most Brilliant Judicial Decision for Homeowner I have ever seen! 4/18/16 HSBC v. Buset
Brilliant Judge Beatrice Buchko; Brilliant Homeowner Defense Attorney (SEE BOTTOM OF LAST PAGE 17 FOR HIS EMAIL ADDRESS)
This judge DISMISSED HSBC Ocwen foreclosure with OSC re Sanctions for Bankster Plaintiff's Fraud on the Court
Judge eloquently explains the interplay between Securitization failure (chain of title broken where no transfer to DEPOSITOR) and the NOTE under UCC
Judge finds NOTE was not a negotiable instrument to be split off and must be considered together with the MORTGAGE (like no salt without pepper)
SLAMS bankster with discovery sanctions for failure to comply with discovery order also! DISMISSES entire bank/servicer case against defendant homeowner
THIS CASE IS SO IMPORTANT I RECOMMEND PRINTING IT OUT (17 PAGES) AND SAVE IT FOR DRAFTING PLEADINGS, MOTIONS AND FOR TRIAL PREP
Nancy Duffy McCarron, CBN 164780
Attorney, Real Estate Broker, BBB Arbitrator, CA Notary Public
Master Certified Forensic Loan Auditor, Property Manager
950 Roble Lane Santa Barbara, CA 93103 805-965-3492 cell 805-450-0450
This E-mail is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2510-2521 and is confidential and may be legally privileged. Any unauthorized or improper disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this E-mail and attached document(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us at 805-965-3492 or by email to [email protected].
To: Lance Cassino
Subject: VERY IMPORTANT! The Most Brilliant Judicial Decision for Homeowner I have ever seen! 4/18/16 HSBC v. Buset
Brilliant Judge Beatrice Buchko; Brilliant Homeowner Defense Attorney (SEE BOTTOM OF LAST PAGE 17 FOR HIS EMAIL ADDRESS)
This judge DISMISSED HSBC Ocwen foreclosure with OSC re Sanctions for Bankster Plaintiff's Fraud on the Court
Judge eloquently explains the interplay between Securitization failure (chain of title broken where no transfer to DEPOSITOR) and the NOTE under UCC
Judge finds NOTE was not a negotiable instrument to be split off and must be considered together with the MORTGAGE (like no salt without pepper)
SLAMS bankster with discovery sanctions for failure to comply with discovery order also! DISMISSES entire bank/servicer case against defendant homeowner
THIS CASE IS SO IMPORTANT I RECOMMEND PRINTING IT OUT (17 PAGES) AND SAVE IT FOR DRAFTING PLEADINGS, MOTIONS AND FOR TRIAL PREP
Nancy Duffy McCarron, CBN 164780
Attorney, Real Estate Broker, BBB Arbitrator, CA Notary Public
Master Certified Forensic Loan Auditor, Property Manager
950 Roble Lane Santa Barbara, CA 93103 805-965-3492 cell 805-450-0450
This E-mail is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2510-2521 and is confidential and may be legally privileged. Any unauthorized or improper disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this E-mail and attached document(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us at 805-965-3492 or by email to [email protected].
“The borrower owes money not to the world at large but to a particular person or institution, and only the person or institution entitled to payment may enforce the debt by foreclosing on the security.”
“[O]nly the entity currently entitled to enforce a debt may foreclose on the mortgage or deed of trust securing that debt . . . .” (Yvanova, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 928.). The court was not influenced by the creation of a false assignment post-foreclosure sale, and ruled according to the recorded documents.” http://cassinovchase.weebly.com/sciarratta-v-us-bank.html
“[O]nly the entity currently entitled to enforce a debt may foreclose on the mortgage or deed of trust securing that debt . . . .” (Yvanova, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 928.). The court was not influenced by the creation of a false assignment post-foreclosure sale, and ruled according to the recorded documents.” http://cassinovchase.weebly.com/sciarratta-v-us-bank.html